Back to articles
Why We Chose Rust for a Deployment Platform
How-ToDevOps

Why We Chose Rust for a Deployment Platform

via Dev.toDAVID VIEJO

Every Rust project eventually publishes a post about memory safety. This isn't going to be that post. Memory safety is real, and it matters, but it's not why we chose Rust for a deployment platform. There are better reasons, and they're more concrete. The single binary problem Deployment tools have a distribution problem. Install a typical self-hosted PaaS and you're pulling Docker images, Node.js runtimes, PHP scripts, and a handful of dependencies that need to stay in sync. Something breaks in an update, and you're debugging which layer of the stack caused it. Temps ships as one binary. No runtime, no interpreter, no package manager to satisfy. Download a ~30MB file and you're done. That binary contains the proxy, the deployment engine, the analytics pipeline, the error tracking backend, the uptime monitor, and the AI gateway. Rust makes this possible. The compiler links everything statically. You cross-compile for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu or aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu on a Mac, uploa

Continue reading on Dev.to

Opens in a new tab

Read Full Article
2 views

Related Articles