
Why Employee Engagement is the Real Bottleneck (297 employees analyzed)
Just finished analyzing 297 employees over 4 time points and the results are interesting π I expected to find that support matters for engagement. And it doesβbut not in the way most HR teams think. The numbers: β Social support: 4.08/5 β Organizational citizenship: 4.09/5 β Engagement: 3.52/5 β the gap So employees feel supported, they want to contribute, they're emotionally stable. But they're not engaged in their actual work. Used mediation analysis to understand the pathway: support doesn't directly drive commitment. It works through engagement first. Which means if engagement is low, support alone won't fix retention π Everything is fully documented in my GitHub: github.com/RicardoPad/People-Analytics β Full Jupyter notebook with code β Methodology: factor analysis, reliability testing (Cronbach's alpha 0.80-0.87), mediation modeling β Findings and business recommendations β Dataset (anonymized) Curious what others are seeing in their data on this. Is engagement the actual bottlen
Continue reading on Dev.to
Opens in a new tab

