Back to articles
The Security Gap in MCP Tool Servers (And What I Built to Fix It)

The Security Gap in MCP Tool Servers (And What I Built to Fix It)

via Dev.to PythonSteve Gonzalez

MCP has no security model. I built Heddle — a policy-and-trust layer that turns YAML configs into validated, policy-enforced MCP tool servers. MCP (Model Context Protocol) is how AI agents connect to tools. Claude Desktop uses it, Cursor uses it, and thousands of developers are building MCP servers to give AI access to their APIs, databases, and infrastructure. There's one problem: MCP has no security model. The protocol defines how a client talks to a server, but says nothing about what that server is allowed to do. No authentication between client and server. No authorization on which tools can be called. No audit trail of what happened. The spec assumes you'll handle all of that yourself. Most people don't. What Actually Goes Wrong I run a self-hosted server with Prometheus, Grafana, Ollama, Gitea, and a handful of other services. I wanted Claude Desktop to query all of them through MCP. The standard approach is to write a Python FastMCP server for each one — a few dozen lines per s

Continue reading on Dev.to Python

Opens in a new tab

Read Full Article
2 views

Related Articles