RFC: We need a standard for "AI SEO". Here is my proposal.

TL;DR: I built an open-source scoring engine to test how "friendly" websites are to AI Agents. The goal isn't to kill modern UX, but to enable "Dual-Mode" access. The Problem We build rich SPAs (Single Page Apps) for humans. We use Tailwind, Framer Motion, and heavy hydration. This is great for UX (User Experience) . But for AI Agents (RAG, LLMs, Search Bots), this "Visual Layer" is expensive noise. Cost: Reading a hydrated DOM costs 5x more tokens than necessary. Hallucination: Visual proximity (CSS) does not equal logical proximity (DOM). Invisibility: Data locked behind client-side JS is often missed entirely. The Proposal: OpenAIX Protocol I drafted a standard called OpenAIX . It’s not about going back to raw HTML. It’s about "Visual/Data Separation" . I wrote a Python scorer to audit websites. Here is the actual logic I am testing. Does this align with how you build apps? 1. The "Dual-Mode" Check Can your site serve two masters? Metric: Does the site offer a "Fast Lane" for AI? My