
Preventing Rogue AI Agents
What happens when the agent itself becomes the threat? Not because of a prompt injection (ASI01) or tool misuse (ASI02), but because the Claude model produces systematically wrong analysis, the Agent Framework has a bug in its tool loop, or the Anthropic API starts returning manipulated responses? Throughout this series, we've covered controls that protect the agent from external threats (hijacked goals, misused tools, stolen identities, supply chain poisoning, code execution, context poisoning, cascading failures, and trust exploitation). But what do you do when everything else fails and the agent itself starts behaving in ways you didn't intend? For my side project ( Biotrackr ), this is the "what if everything breaks?" scenario. The agent is designed to be a helpful health data assistant, but if the underlying model drifts, the framework has a bug, or a dependency is compromised, the agent could start producing harmful analysis, calling tools excessively, or leaking system internals
Continue reading on Dev.to
Opens in a new tab




