
Point at UI bugs instead of describing them to Claude Code
I built a skill that lets you point at UI bugs instead of describing them to Claude Code The fix-check-explain loop was killing my momentum. So we built Bugshot — open source, one command to install. The problem no one talks about Everyone praises AI-assisted coding for how fast you can ship features. What they don't mention is the part where you stare at a broken layout, then walk back to your terminal and try to describe it in words. The sidebar overlaps the main content. I think it's a z-index issue. Also the button on the right side is cut off. Did Claude understand exactly what you meant? Maybe. Probably not. So you clarify. You re-explain. You add more detail. The fix-check-explain loop becomes the slowest part of your workflow — not the code, not the logic, just the communication. BEFORE "The sidebar overlaps the main content area. It looks like a z-index issue. The gap between the header and the card below is too large. Also the button on the right is cut off." AFTER [screensho
Continue reading on Dev.to
Opens in a new tab

![[Learning notes and hw] getting started with R-cnn: Manually implementing Intersection over Union (IoU)](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia2.dev.to%2Fdynamic%2Fimage%2Fwidth%3D800%252Cheight%3D%252Cfit%3Dscale-down%252Cgravity%3Dauto%252Cformat%3Dauto%2Fhttps%253A%252F%252Fdev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%252Fuploads%252Farticles%252Favit2emoxc0g68e5ltqj.jpg&w=1200&q=75)
