
Mapping AI Infrastructure to the EU AI Act and ISO 42001
Artificial intelligence regulation is no longer theoretical. The European Union AI Act is moving from draft language into enforcement reality. At the same time, ISO 42001 introduces a formal AI management system framework. NIST has published its AI Risk Management Framework. Canada continues to refine privacy expectations under PIPEDA. Most organizations are reacting at the policy level. The real question is this: Can your AI architecture demonstrate alignment at the system level? This article explains how we approach regulatory mapping as an architectural discipline rather than a documentation exercise. The Difference Between “Compliant” and “Architected to Align” There is a critical distinction that is often misunderstood. Certification and compliance are formal outcomes that require independent assessment. Architecture is what makes those outcomes possible. When we describe our systems as “architected to align with” the EU AI Act or ISO 42001, we mean that the structural controls re
Continue reading on Dev.to Webdev
Opens in a new tab




