
I Reviewed 32 SAST Tools - The Ones Worth Using
I spent 6 weeks testing 32 SAST tools. Most of them wasted my time. I have been reviewing static application security testing tools for the better part of three years. I have configured enterprise scanners that took a week to deploy. I have written custom Semgrep rules at 2 AM to catch a vulnerability pattern our existing tools missed. I have sat through vendor demos where the salesperson showed me a perfectly curated scan on a 50-line demo app while glossing over the fact that their tool produces 400 false positives on a real codebase. This time, I decided to be thorough. I took 32 SAST tools - everything from legacy enterprise platforms to brand-new AI-native engines - and tested them against the same set of real codebases with planted vulnerabilities. I tracked detection rates, false positive rates, scan times, and something I call the "developer trust score" - whether the findings were good enough that a developer would actually read them instead of clicking "dismiss all." The resu
Continue reading on Dev.to
Opens in a new tab


