
I Audited My Claude Code Setup Before Training 80 Engineers. Here's What I Was Doing Wrong.
The Embarrassing Truth I'm a Tech Lead running 8-10 parallel projects on Claude Code. I thought my setup was good. It wasn't. Before running an internal training session for ~80 engineers at my company, I decided to audit everything. I checked Anthropic's official documentation — every page. I went through GitHub repos: GStack (Garry Tan, 20K+ stars), Everything Claude Code (100K+ stars), shanraisshan's best-practice repo , VoltAgent's subagents, Antigravity's 1,304-skill library. I read Reddit threads, Hacker News discussions, Medium articles, Twitter threads from Anthropic engineers. Then I looked at my own setup and realized I was leaving 80% of Claude Code's value on the table. What I Found Wrong 50 agents loaded. I had agents for everything — ux-researcher, compliance-auditor, trend-researcher, feedback-synthesizer. Most I'd never used once. Each one consumed tokens and confused Claude's routing when it had to pick which specialist to delegate to. Zero hooks. Not a single safety g
Continue reading on Dev.to Webdev
Opens in a new tab




