Back to articles
How We Evaluate AI Agents Before Recommending Them to Clients

How We Evaluate AI Agents Before Recommending Them to Clients

via Dev.toLowCode Agency

We get asked which AI agent platform to use at least a dozen times a week. Our answer is always the same: it depends on the workflow, not the tool. We have shipped over 350 products, many of them AI-powered, across 20+ industries. The evaluation framework below is what we actually use when a client comes to us with an agent build in scope. It is not a tool comparison. It is a decision framework built from production experience. Key Takeaways Reliability under real inputs matters more than benchmark performance: an agent that scores well on evals but fails on your actual data is not a good agent for your use case. Tool-calling quality is the most underexamined criterion: the ability to call the right tool at the right time with the right parameters separates production-ready agents from demo-ready ones. Context window behavior determines viability for long workflows: agents that lose track of earlier steps in multi-step workflows create errors that compound and are difficult to trace. C

Continue reading on Dev.to

Opens in a new tab

Read Full Article
1 views

Related Articles