How SendRec Compares to Loom, Zight, and Cap

Why comparison pages matter When teams evaluate async video tools, the default is usually Loom. It is the market leader, the name people know, and the one most likely to already be in your organization. But "everyone uses it" is not an evaluation. It is inertia. We built detailed comparison pages for SendRec against three tools that cover the spectrum: Loom (the market leader), Zight (formerly CloudApp, a mid-market alternative), and Cap (the closest open-source competitor). Each page is a side-by-side breakdown of data hosting, features, pricing, and deployment — not marketing copy, but verifiable facts. SendRec vs Loom Full comparison → Loom is owned by Atlassian (acquired for $975M in November 2023). It is a polished product with a large feature set. Here is where the two diverge: Data hosting. Loom stores all data on AWS in the United States. There is no EU data residency option. SendRec lets you host on any EU server or use our managed platform (Hetzner, Helsinki). Source code. Lo