
From AI-Augmented Human to Human-Augmented AI
Sometime in late 2025, the relationship between software engineers and AI inverted. I can't pinpoint the exact moment. But looking at my workflow across ten active projects - Java libraries, LinkedIn automation tools, Odoo modules, browser extensions - the pattern is clear. I stopped using AI to help me write code. AI writes the code. I specify what to build, review what comes back, and steer when it drifts. The terminology is catching up. Andrej Karpathy declared "vibe coding" passé in February 2026 and promoted "agentic engineering" - where "you are not writing the code directly 99% of the time." Nicholas Zakas mapped a three-stage progression: Coder to Conductor to Orchestrator. Researchers at ArXiv formalized it as "Software Engineering 3.0," analyzing 456,000 AI-authored pull requests across 61,000 repositories. Different labels. Same observation: the human moved from doing the work with AI assistance to overseeing AI doing the work. But here's what nobody is saying clearly enough
Continue reading on Dev.to
Opens in a new tab


