Back to articles
Everyone Building AI Research Tools Is Solving the Wrong Problem

Everyone Building AI Research Tools Is Solving the Wrong Problem

via Dev.tozenoguy

I spent 4 hours on Semantic Scholar, opened 40 tabs, and ended up less informed than when I started. I kept building retrieval layers. Better embeddings. Faster similarity search. Then I ran it on my own research topic and realized I still didn't know what the papers meant together. They weren't looking for a better way to find papers. They were looking for a way to understand what they meant together. So I deleted the vector database and started over. What Happened When I Stopped Optimizing Retrieval I fed a raw research topic to an LLM. Not a query. Not keywords. The actual thing someone cares about. "I want to use federated learning for cancer detection but I don't know if anyone's already doing this, what the gaps are, or if it's even fundable." 3 minutes later, I had: A hierarchical map of everything ever published on that intersection – organized by actual concepts , not similarity scores 3 research gaps ranked by priority – with explanations of why they're underexplored and what

Continue reading on Dev.to

Opens in a new tab

Read Full Article
2 views

Related Articles