Do you think there's value in automated git summaries for standups and sprint reviews?

I built a small tool and I'm honestly at a loss trying to figure out if it's solving a real problem or not. It let's you generate plain-English summaries (both technical and business impact) of what you actually worked on in a connected repo over whatever time period you select. I built it because I realized with llm's I was dev'ing a lot faster than the ticket cadence by my PM and was losing track of how much I actually built. So I use it for standups, but I could see it being useful for quarterly reviews, investor meetings, or even as a daily digest. The Confusion I talked to a PM friend today who basically said "interesting but I wouldn't pay for it — I already get this from Linear." My pushback was that Linear already uses tickets as the source of truth. And it doesn't actually take into account what happened. Anyway, he's probably right for his situation. But I'm not sure PM's at a very modern startup is my MCP. So I'm asking here instead bc I'm more interested in what independent