Common FAPI Misconceptions

For some time now, I've been interested in FAPI from both an Identity practitioner's and a developer's perspective. I've written a few posts on this topic on the Auth0 blog and created a guide to FAPI with the support of colleagues who are much more experienced than I am. Surfing the web and talking to developers, however, I couldn't help but notice some misunderstandings about certain aspects of FAPI. In this article, I'll summarize the most common and recurring ones. Misconception 1: FAPI Is a New Protocol FAPI is a security profile based on OAuth 2.1 , it is not a new protocol , intended as an alternative to established standards like OAuth 2.0, SAML, or OpenID Connect (OIDC). It acts as a prescriptive blueprint that defines exactly which OAuth 2.0 and OIDC extensions must be used and how they must be configured. While the core OAuth 2.0 specification ( RFC 6749 ) is a flexible framework that provides a "toolbox" of flows and leaves security decisions to the implementer, FAPI remove