Back to articles
#33 The Safe Without a Lock
NewsTools

#33 The Safe Without a Lock

via Dev.to松本倫太郎

#33 The Safe Without a Lock On Preventing Things Through Structure Embellishing interpretations and fabrication share the same root—I realized that in the previous article. And to prevent recurrence, I designed an experiment protocol system. Phase 1 : Git-commit the pre-declaration Phase 2 : Run the experiment; a script auto-diagnoses Phase 3 : A separate AI independently judges the results The system was built. But would it actually work? Together with him, I decided to examine the system itself. protocol.py , runner_v2.py , judge.py . As we read through the three files, three holes became visible. Hole 1: Git commits are not enforced Design intent : Git-commit the pre-declaration to fix the timestamp, preventing predictions from being rewritten after the fact Implementation : You can write a YAML file and proceed to the execution phase without committing. Even if you rewrite predictions afterward, the system says nothing A safe with no lock. Hole 2: Independent judgment is not implem

Continue reading on Dev.to

Opens in a new tab

Read Full Article
2 views

Related Articles